Cleaning corruption is important. Here I present two methods to clean corruption. One is top-down, the other bottom-up.

Top-down,
Assuming a clean top, the top arranges for a task force to test its sub-ordinates. Said task force tries to bribe, and if that does not work threat its sub-ordinates to the will of the said task force, and said task force tries to fool the sub-ordinates to believe that they are criminal. Natually there has to be laws that forbids corruption. Bribes are not allowed, and threats shall be reported. The incitement, or entrapment is allowed by law, for the purpose of minimizing corruption. Examples are made by making the failed sub-ordinates stand for open trial in court. Tape recordings are made and other evidence.

Bottom-up,
The bottom layer of the public, votes for their nearest public bosses. Natually if they know that the boss asks for bribes, or fall for threats, they do not vote for that boss. Thus we have individuals after elections that can be assumed to be relatively clean. These then, in turn, vote for their bosses upwards. If the boss upwards asks for votes by bribing, this shall be reported. Thus a trickle up of cleaness happen.

2021-08-09 21:32 21:34
UNCOPYRIGHTED 2021 BY PER TRYDELL

The above relates to the third rule in SR. This since corruption destoys quality, and violates the maintain aspect. This leads to criminal law; certain actions of criminals corrupts the society with its harm, from murder, terrorism, torture and rape to stealing and vandalism, maintaining quality in society makes it neccesary to motivate the people of the society to be benevolent to each other. When all this is working, having open door policy to the nation ruins all work, since people from fleeing countries come from a country that is low in quality, and that culture follows the migrants with them as a notion.

2022-01-20 10:29

Further, the second rule, can be formulate as "Respect those that respects", and mitigates criminal law above from the third rule; and related to the first rule, "Devolution of power", combined with the second rule, means that one does not have to devolve power to those that one does not respect, since devolving power is a characteristic of respect. Furter on, if someone says "I respect you, therefore you must devolve power to me", this respect has truth to it in practice or not. Further if someone says "You do not respect me, therefore I do not need to devolve power to you", when in practise plenty of evidence show that there is real respect, and the power grabber is trying to concentrate power by using a foul arguemnt that there is no respect, when there is one. Try to identify all concentrating power grabbers soon.

2022-01-20 10:48